|
Life Annuity at 65
People are
living longer. Many people may not realise that longer
life expectancy will have a significant impact on their personal
finance and standard of living.
Let us
take an example of a person at age 65, with an accumulated
savings of $100,000. This can come from the CPF minimum
sum or personal savings.
If this
sum is withdrawn over 20 years at a guaranteed interest rate of
4% per annum, the payout is about $601 per month.
The
interest rate of 4% is the current interest rate payable on the
retirement account in the Central Provident Fund. This rate may
change in the future, as it will be pegged to the Government
bond rate.
Based on
the death rates of the population in 2005, about 39% of males
and 53% of females are projected to survive to age 85. For these
people, their total savings will be depleted in 20 years time.
7% of
males and 11% of females are expected to survive for 30 years to
age 95.
To be
prudent, they should be encouraged to draw down their savings
over 30 years, instead of 20 years. In this case, the payout
will drop to $473 a month, but it can last for 30 years.
The
trouble is, a monthly sum of $473 is smaller and there is still
a risk (albeit smaller) of running out of cash after 30 years.
Get
ready for another shock!
The
chance of running out of cash is actually much higher. Why? Due
to falling death rates, people are living longer.
Over the
past 25 years, death rate has been falling by an average of
about 3.0 % a year. This trend is likely to continue for
the foreseeable future.
For
males at 65 now, 52% is likely to survive to 85 years and 24% to
95 years. For females, 65% will survive to 85 years and 32% to
95 years.
Even if
you choose to draw down a smaller payout of $473 over 30 years,
the chance of running out of cash is still quite high, i.e. 24%
for males and 32% for females.
Is there
a better solution?
Get
ready for a surprise! The answer is “buy a life annuity”.
If you
use $100,000 to buy a life annuity at age 65 and it is
administered to give an investment yield of 4% per annum, you
will get a payout of 619 for a male, and $551 for a female.
The payout is higher than a 30 year drawdown scheme.
If the
invested sum is higher or lower than $100,000, the payout will
be adjusted proportionately.
Why is a
life annuity able to give a higher payout compared to the 30
year drawdown scheme?
The
savings of all life annuitants are placed into a common pool. An
financial expert, called the actuary, calculates the number of
people likely to survive each year and receive a payout. Those
who die earlier will leave behind the balance of their savings
to make the payout to those who live longer. The calculation can
be made quite precise to give the highest possible payout to the
annuitants.
Every
annuitant hopes to live longer and to receive a payout that is
more than the money invested. This is possible only if those who
die earlier leave their balance in the pool. This is
called pooling of the longevity risk.
Without
pooling, each annuitant has to do his own calculation. They have
to be prudent and draw down a smaller monthly sum, so that the
money can last longer.
Can the
annuitant insure against the risk of dying earlier?
Yes. It
is possible to opt for an annuity that provides a partial refund
of the initial investment, in the event of early death. A scheme
can be designed to guarantee 20 years of payment. If the
annuitant dies within 20 years, the remaining payment, that is,
20 years less the
amount paid out, will be given to the estate immediately.
The
monthly payout under this kind of “with refund” annuity will be
$498 for a male and $486 for a female. Compared to the “no
refund” annuity, the payout is lower by 20% for a male and 12%
for a female.
The
annuitant can choose a larger payout under the “no refund”
annuity or a smaller payout under the “with refund” annuity.
The
Government plans to introduce a longevity insurance scheme to
pay out a monthly sum of $300 to a person from age 85.
From 65 to 85 years, they draw down a monthly sum from the
retirement account.
I
believe that a life annuity payable at 65, not 85, may be better
for most ordinary people, compared to the longevity insurance.
Tan Kin Lian
|
|
Based on death rates
in 2005 |
Allow for annual decrease
in death rates |
|
75 yrs
|
85 yrs
|
95 yrs
|
75 yrs
|
85 yrs
|
95yrs
|
|
Male
|
77%
|
39%
|
7%
|
80%
|
52%
|
24%
|
|
Female
|
87%
|
53%
|
11%
|
88%
|
65%
|
32%
|
|
|
Monthly
payout for an investment of $100,000 at age 65 |
|
Fixed
for
20 yrs
|
Fixed
for
30 yrs
|
Lifetime
no refund
|
Lifetime
with refund
|
|
Male
|
$601
|
$473
|
$619
|
$498
|
|
Female
|
$601
|
$473
|
$551
|
$486
|
The writer is a
qualified actuary and served as CEO of NTUC Income for 30 years
prior to his retirement. He writes a blog
www.tankinlian.blogspot.com.
The calculations are
based on the death rates of the population, with projection for
future improvement in mortality. It assumes an investment yield
of 4% per annum and ignore expenses and profit margin.
These calculations are
made to educate the public about the principles of a life
annuity and do not reflect the commercial terms that may be
offered by any specific annuity provider.
|